even though you routinely insult people and hide behind the facade of being in the media? Where is fair play in that? Plus, whatever happened to freedom of speech etc.? You know, all the stuff that media keeps demanding for itself.Дo you know what Wikipedia has to say about Barkha Dutt? This: So, someone calls you an idiot and you go ahead and serve them a legal notice. The worst that can be said about his post is that it had an angry 'tone' and that he used the word 'idiot' to describe a certain 'journalist' (I can't tell you what her name is, but it might rhyme with Darkha Butt, or may be not). Kunte are, but I wish he hadn't apologized merely for (a) holding an opinion (b) speaking the truth and (c) quoting from Wikipedia. I don't know what the personal circumstances of Mr. In the retraction, he apologizes to Barkha Dutt and NDTV on three specific counts. Now, the retraction is smelling strongly of a pseudo-legal notice being 'served' by e-mail to Chyetanya. On January 26, he published a retraction.

Chyetanya wrote an angry post ( cached version here scroll right to the bottom and save a copy of the post titled 'Shoddy journalism'). Chyetanya Kunte) watching the media coverage was shocked by certain aspects of the coverage by Barkha Dutt and NDTV. In the present context, it is NDTV and Barkha Dutt who are the culprits.ДЄs the Mumbai terrorist attack was unfolding, an Indian citizen and blogger ( Mr. Those are the things that define the current state of our media in general. That, and a complete lack of a sense of irony.

Barkha dutt marriage ndtv